the chart below shows information about students studying in six main subjects at a US university in 2010
The bar graph illustrates the number of males and females choosing six main subjects at a university in the US in the year 2010.
Overall, the Finance course was the most attractive with both gender, whilst the Engineering's figure for males and females were the lowest in six courses. Besides, the big difference in the number of males and females learning Mathematics.
Looking at the detail, males and females studying Finance were the highest numbers with approximately 230 students. The number of males and females who studied Accounting was relative with 170 and 200 students. However, the figure for female students learning Marketing was higher than that of male students by 40 students.
The least interesting subject for students was Engineering, at about 60 learners for males and females. The figure for males studying Mathematics at 200 students that were four times as much as of females with over 50 students. Finally, with 150 students of males choosing Economies, that number was double times of female students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-09 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unempolyment rates in England between 1993 and 2012 67
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 to 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city 67
- The table below shows thenumbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to market'.
Suggestion: To market
...the figure for female students learning Marketing was higher than that of male students b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17964071856 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6767471749 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502994011976 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.4193488848 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179539887738 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943395717766 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912385250016 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145645096549 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11013563882 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.