The chart below shows male and female fitness membership in Thailand between 1985 and 2015
The bar chart illustrates how many male and female doing fitness in Thailand from 1985 to 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that there were more men members than women although both figures of men and women fluctuated wildly during the period.
Looking at the details, in 1985, there were more than 2000 men which was twice as high as that of women, followed by a sharp rise by nearly 1000 after 5 years. However, the period from 1990 to 2000 witnessed a considerable decrease to 2500 and 1500 respectively, before increasing slightly to about 2000 in 2005. And 5 years later there was a soar in the number of men with 5000 which reached the highest point in this period. After that, a significant drop was seen in this figure with only 1000 from 2010 to 2015.
Turning to the female’s data, in 1985 the number of women fitness was about 1100. Then, the following 10 years saw a wild fluctuation between 1100 and 1300 before increasing sharply to 3000 in 2000. After that there was a slight decrease to 2100 in 5 years later, followed by a sharp growth to 3000 in 2010 at which it falled up to 2000 in 2015
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Topic In some countries governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 56
- The line ghaph beow shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Sumarinze the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 80
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the disadvatage outweight advantage 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44607843137 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3043335051 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4068568513 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157786423828 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824027814747 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128162594671 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142597662009 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16468757114 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.