The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how many men and women students chose neccessary subjects ranging from sciences to law in university in 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of male choosing humanities was the same as that of femalw.
Looking at the details, there were 22 thousands male studying sciences which was twice as much as female with 11 thousands. Likewise, men students studied more mathematics than women with 18 thousands and 4 thousands, resectively. While, the male's choice of literature was 15 thousands higher than female's, there were more men choosing law than women with 10 thousands and 5 thousands, respectively.
Turning to the other datas, female chose by far the most social sciences among these subjects with almost 25 thousands, while there were nearly 15 thousands male studying this subject. Similarly, the number of women studied languages was sighnificantly higher than that of men with 18 thousands and 2 thousands, respectively. Women students chose more the arts than male wuth 10 thousands. In contrast, there was a slight different with humanities when there were the same students choosing it with 13 thousands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | Ayu Maulida | view | |
| 2022-05-24 | BaoNganB2109248 | view | |
| 2022-03-11 | truongminhhuy | 79 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | Nguyễn Trung Tính | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | bths2002 | view |
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership in Thailand between 1985 and 2015 61
- Topic In some countries governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In some countries more and more adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found job Do the advantages of this trend outweigh disadvantages 56
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the disadvatage outweight advantage 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, similarly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20967741935 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81809166851 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521505376344 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1955162753 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0933334408904 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538898241597 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644889167263 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867575367359 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826534472775 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.