The chart gives information about the trip's data and its purpose based on five different factors (day trip, sports/ entertainment, visiting friends, shopping and traveling to work) taken by men and women residing in a specific European country in the year 2007.
Overall, men tend to travel most for work whereas women are attracted maximum to shopping. Both men and women plan least day trips. The data for traveling to work shows the most significant difference after the data for shopping.
Noticeably, women take almost 25 day trips and men have a higher number of day trips than women which is around 35. Sports or entertainment data among men and women depicts that men are more interested in these trips than women and the data states almost 140 to 130 respectively. Men traveled to work more frequently than women taking nearly 325 trips in a year however women’s work trip data was just close to 210.
In addition to this, women were more interested in shopping and visiting friends as compared to men. The proportion of men and women for visiting friends was slightly lower than 200 and a bit more than 200 respectively. Similarly, if we consider the data for shopping, women have a higher ranger of nearly 275 than men which is only close to 190.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'plan the least'.
Suggestion: plan the least
...maximum to shopping. Both men and women plan least day trips. The data for traveling to wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese trips than women and the data states almost 140 to 130 respectively. Men trav...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8119266055 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54150381592 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4319758965 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294537297878 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129468592745 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737362408468 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187808623726 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808202389265 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.