The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the figure for female students per 100 male students attending three levels of formal education in both of developing and developed countries during the eight-year period from 1990.
Overall, the number of girls per 100 boys who went to formal education in both developed and developing countries increased variably. However, in developing countries, when the level of education got higher, the less number of girls attended formal educational institution.
In 1990, among 100 male students who went to elementary school in developing countries, there were 83 female students who pursued their primary education. This figure increased slightly eight years later which rose by four female students. However, while the number of girls who went to secondary school in developing nations increased from 72 to 82 students in 1998, the figure for girls who went to university was less than 80 compared to the number of female students in both primary and secondary education. Approximately, the figures for girls attending formal education in developing countries were still below the target.
In contrast, in developed nations, among 100 boys, more than 90 girls went to primary and secondary education in 1990. This figure remained constant in the final year which reached slightly under 100 female students per 100 male students. Meanwhile, the number of girls among 100 boys who pursued their higher education went beyond the target since 1990, increasing slightly by approximately 6% in the final year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
...who went to university was less than 80 compared to the number of female students in bot...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40163934426 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68249523841 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438524590164 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6660041367 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.8 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179224380204 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952307632728 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475393545441 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138143688279 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042923716909 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.