The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
The bar chart gives information on how the number of households, categorised by their yearly income, changed in the three years 2007, 2011, and 2015 in the United States.
Overall, throughout 8 years, households earning less than $50000 had an initial increase, followed by a minimal decline. On the contrary, households with incomes exceeding $75000 witnessed a slight decrease before rebounding with a higher number than in the beginning. However, those with middle-income ranges remained stable during this period.
Regarding those with incomes below $25000, starting from about 25 million in 2007, it then rose to nearly 29 million 4 years later and saw a decrease to about $27000. Similarly, households earning in the range of $25000 to below $50000 also had the same trend when it was roughly 27 million in 2007, increased to 30 million, then fell back to approximately $29000 in 2014. Enter those who had middle-level incomes, from $50000 to less than $75000. The number of households stayed unchanged across 8 years, from 2007 to 2015.
In terms of those who made over $75000 per year, there were nearly 15 million households earning from $75000 to $99999 in the US in 2007 and then this number declined to approximately 13 million, prior to reaching 15 million in the last year. Witnessing the same status, but to a much greater extent, beginning at about 30 million households in 2007, this group showed a small fall and then continually dominated the chart by roughly 33 million households in 2015.
- The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 67
- Topic in the attached picture 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, regarding, similarly, so, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94023904382 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66218347184 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553784860558 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0603995853 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28633422027 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115110401992 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785044640753 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174576801774 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454397410677 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.