The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the annual income of the number of house owners who live in five different groups of income’s rates the United States in three 2007, 2011, and 2015 years.
It is obvious that in 2007 and 2015 there was an upward trend totally by the income of people who have a home and there was a decline in 2011 that had a downward trend rather than others. The highest number was related to 2015 and the lowest number was in 2007.
As can be seen, the two less than 25000$ and 25000-49999$ have increased to 30 million and then recovered to their first location in 2015. In contrast, the 100000 or more income annually people decreased in 2011 and then raised more than 34 million and hit peak. The owners of 75000-99999$ salary declined in 2007 and 2011 by about 1 million and reached 15 million in 2015. Although there were lots of changes in the owner’s income in the United States the people included 50000-74999$ did not change in these years.
In conclusion, the point is that the number of households income who gain less than 49999$ decreased.
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$25000'.
Suggestion: $25000
...07. As can be seen, the two less than 25000$ and 25000-49999$ have increased to 30 m...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-74999$ did not change in these years. In conclusion, the point is that the num...
^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$49999'.
Suggestion: $49999
...of households income who gain less than 49999$ decreased.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59375 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34684980198 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5914949134 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219877741112 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100831114619 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542526373822 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14325938331 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432252001271 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.