The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in somewhere town from 2012 to 2015
The chart designates the number of people in thousands who took three forms of public transportation which are tram, bus and train in somewhere town in the four-year period from 2012 to 2015.
In general, the number of commuters using trams grew progressively and became the most popular forms of transport. Likewise, bus usage fluctuated but still remained popular. However, the number of people who took trains declined abruptly, although regained passengers by the end of the period.
The number of commuters taking the train commenced at around 76,000 passengers in 2012. It then declined sharply in the following year, to about 10,000 passengers. By 2015 train usage recovered to around 54,000 passengers. Bus passenger numbers followed a parallel pattern, starting at just over 50,000 passengers, declining in 2013, and then recovered to the same figure as at the beginning of the period.
On the other hand, about 23,000 people used trams in 2012, and over the next 3 years, the number of people taking this form of transport grew steadily to around 96,000 passengers in 2015. Trams proved to be the most popular form of transportation over the whole period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-28 | amritkumar | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | Fara Has | view | |
| 2021-06-22 | dinhthu05 | view | |
| 2020-09-18 | nagakhoa | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-02 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION OF ELECTRICITY IN 2014 IELTS 13 TEST 3 90
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, likewise, so, still, then, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17010309278 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68780206577 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551546391753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6939634161 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290578731554 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11240943392 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110876696921 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202569926626 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114600992066 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.