The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar chart compares how many visitors used three different important airports in New York City over a period of 6 years.
It is clear that all the number of travelers of these airports increased considerably over the period shown. Additionally, LaGuardia was the most popular airport for passengers.
In 1995, the number of visitors choosing the LaGuardia airport was highest, at about 36 million, while the figure for the Newark was significantly lower, at only around 17 million. Meanwhile, approximately 28 million passengers who used the John F. Kennedy airport. In 1997, there were steady increases in the figures for the John F. Kennedy, the LaGuardia, the Newark to 47 million, 43 million and just under 40 million respectively.
Between 1998 and 2000, the number of travelers using the LaGuardia continued to grow to 68 million and became the highest figure in the chart, whereas the John F. Kennedy's figure saw a considerable rise to roughly 43 million in 2000. At the same time, the figure for the Newark remained stable at slightly above 40 million.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 61
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0395480226 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76886885702 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6081191883 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223198732512 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890193786222 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090540887792 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157122610101 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777358560084 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.