The chart above illustrates the sum of trips carried out by children aged 5-12 in an unspecified country between the years 1990 and 2010, back and forth from school utilizing different modes of transportation
The information pertaining to 1990 demonstrates that the majority of schoolers used walking as their preferred way of commuting, reaching a staggering number of 12 million trips per year. The other methods used during that period, including cycling and the use of bus, in addition to the combined utilization of walking and bus riding hover around 6 million trips per year, which account to only half of the trips made by walking in comparison. Going with the previous trend, the amount of trips made by cars was also modest, registering only 4 million trips per year during that period.
On the other end of the spectrum, the same country witnessed a dominance of car usage in 2010. With a dramatic rise to almost the double of the number in 1990, trips made by car reached almost 11 million trips, making it the dominant transportation method. This resulted in a drop in number of trips using other means of transportation, with cycling taking the major hit, with only 2 million trips in that period.
To conclude, by 2010, the usage of car was the dominant means of transportation, surpassing all other contenders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ng different modes of transportation the information pertaining to 1990 demonstr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93362831858 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79203539823 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544247787611 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.7456090146 43.030603864 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.285714286 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2857142857 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251306467822 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111735553091 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747744508472 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150840883761 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859171389625 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 11.4329268293 258% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.