The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport

The given bar chart sets out information about the average proportions for five various, particular ways of transportation to and from school chosen by children of 5_to 12_year_olds, between the years 1990 and 2010, in a country, and was measured in millions. Overall, the two years display vastly different patterns with the car passenger becoming the most popular mode at the end of the period.

In the light of the evidence represented in the chart, it is noticeable that aside from figures for car passenger which rose abruptly, all categories underwent downturns in their factors, predominantly it can be seen in the ratios for walking bracket which was the largest portion at well over 12 million in 1990. This rate had been halved relatively, by 2010. Meanwhile, just over 6 million is shown to be made up of those who were favored to cycle in 1990. Whereas, in 2010, the mode lost its popularity strikingly of around 4 million. There were also two downward trends of approximately 2 million in the number of both types of trips walking and bus and bus.

With regard to the amount of car passenger trips, it became roughly three times higher than it used to be in 2010 which meant that other modes such as walking, cycling and taking the bus were less popular among children in comparison with the year 1990.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, while, such as, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79824561404 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63679308005 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640350877193 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.743869005 43.030603864 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.75 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221256234382 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840180554858 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388643107608 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140648633072 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272629916612 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.