The research indicates the statistical information of daily internet users in Britain for 4 years (2003-2006).
Overall, older people were the less in the number of net users. On the other hand, the highest consumers of the internet were the young ones. The difference between these users was around 70 to 80%.
At a young age around four-fifths were the daily net consumers in the years 2003 and 2004. For the next couple of yours, they were just growing and the number reached at its peak. Individuals from the age group 25-44 were increased by 10% each year.
The Poll also depicts the constant raise of net uses among middle aged persons in all four years. Only fluctuation was indicated in the age group of 55-64. In the years 2003 and 2004 approximately 30 to 35% people used internet. Next year little decrease was registered. But, in 2004 sudden growth was shown. The internet was not so popular among senior citizens. Round 15% retirees where started to be familiar with internet from 2004 and this number was remained almost same for upcoming 2 years.
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 78
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 85
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below show the number of working hoirs per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8097826087 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40582915881 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8615820972 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.2142857143 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1428571429 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174495529047 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605814348631 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048363645507 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103509229815 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326179321607 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.73 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.