The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people in different age groups using the Internet each day in the UK over the time given.
Overall, the 4-year period recorded downward trends. Though the rate of people using the Internet in 2005 saw the highest percent. As highlighted in the graph, 2005 generally surpassed three years apart.
When it comes to 2003 and 2004, between the age group 16 and 54, there was wide fluctuation around 70% and 75% respectively. Then the proportion of individuals using the Internet in the UK diminished sharply to nearly 20% from 54 to 65+ years old.
In 2005, instead of varying significantly around 85% at the age 16 to 54, that former dropped dramatically by 60% between the 54 and 65+ ages group. As regard to the year 2006, the figure for people using the Internet between 16 and 24 years old reached 90%. After that from the age 25 to 54 a stability at 80% was seen in that figure, followed by an exponential decrease to 20% at the age 65+.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...4-year period recorded downward trends. Though the rate of people using the Internet i...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...generally surpassed three years apart. When it comes to 2003 and 2004, between ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62146892655 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57753462924 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587570621469 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2694383988 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192813069177 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807600594354 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689404575267 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133836694925 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751447770209 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.