The pie chart illustrates the proportion of different activities done by maturities a day in one country between 1958 and 2008.
What stands out from the graph is that there were two opposite trends. While working, traveling to work and relaxing at home had a tendency of doing up, going out with friends and family and sleeping witnessed a downward trend. In addition, sleeping and working were the main activities of adult people in one day in both of the years.
In 1958, starting at a quite high point, the percentage of working hours ranked the first at 33%, followed by the data of sleeping hours and going out with friends and family at 32% and 19% respectively. Over the period of 50 years, working was still the activity with the highest percentage of adults at 42% in a day and bounced to a fourth. By contrast, the rate of sleeping and going out with friends or family experienced a downward trend to 25% and 6% respectively during the same period..
Turning to the other three activities, Traveling to work accounted for 2% in 1958. However, this figure leapt substantially to 8% which was four times higher. Similarly, relaxing at home activity experienced the same upward trend from 8% to 13%. The figure for other activities like hobbies or playing sports stayed the same throughout the period shown.
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 61
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oportion of different activities done by maturities a day in one country between ...
^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urs ranked the first at 33%, followed by the data of sleeping hours and going out...
^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...d 6% respectively during the same period.. Turning to the other three activities...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79385964912 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6355635039 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548245614035 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.474649256 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3636363636 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173272824285 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712280789569 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746517961115 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124663588734 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666139572218 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.