The supplied bar chart describes how the typology of accommodation changed in England and Wales in the period that went from 1918 to 2011. In general, the trend of owned accommodations is the opposite of that of rented accommodations.
First, the highest percentage of people living in rent was reached in 1918, when roughly 80% lived in a house without owning it. In the same year, the ratio of people living in a property house touched the nadir at 22%. Since then, the two percentages had opposite trends: the number of people living in their own home climbed up to almost 31% in 1939 and 1953, when the people in a rented accommodation exhibited a moderate decrease to 68%.
Next, the householder in owned housing experienced constant growth, reaching 40, 50 and 60 percent respectively in 1961,1971 and 1981, the converse for the householder in rented accommodation. In 1991 and 2001, the first kind of accommodation reached its maximum at 68 percentage, while the second kind reached its minimum at 32.
Eventually, in the period from 2001 to 2011, the trend had a slight change: people living in rent growth of 5 percentage points while people living in their own house had a decline of the same percentage.
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 46
- The graph and chart below give information about 3D cinema screens and film releases. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 56
- the chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different areas 11
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, then, while, in general, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89423076923 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86034662939 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3249392876 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181375898822 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908930053847 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580007754739 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12513050817 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06807259647 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.