Contained in the bar chart provided is data pertaining to the proportion of households that owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales from 1918 and 2011. Overall, there was an upward trend in households owning accommodation, whereas the trend for households renting accommodation was downward.
Regarding the proportion of households that owned their accommodation, one sees a pattern of increase. It is clear that households in owned accommodation rose steadily from just over 20% in 1918 to nearly 70% in 1991. However, after reaching peak at approximately 70% in 2001, the figure for households in owned accommodation witnessed a slight drop to about 64% as the period ended.
Turning to the percentage of households renting accommodation, the trend in evidence was one of decrease. In spite of starting at around 78% in 1918, the figure experienced a considerable reduction to a bottom of about 31% in 2001. In the next decade, the household renting accommodation grew minimally by 5% to 36% by the end of the period.
Finally, a noticeable event that took place in 1971 was the intersection of the two given figures at exactly 50%.
- Cambridge 7 Test 1:The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You 67
- Some people find that following a strict routine allows them to feel more in control Others however think that constant changes to the routine make life more interesting and less predictable Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for you 39
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age They are from the United States in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, regarding, whereas, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14893617021 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20790106518 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558510638298 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.8008013721 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241529895513 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107558498336 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832013615931 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139243263553 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981179675102 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.