The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrate the percentage of the households lived in their own houses and rental houses in two countries (England and Wales) between 1918 and 2011.

Overall, we clearly see that the number of household living in owned houses and rented houses ran to the opposite level from 1918 to 2011. The percentage of the families who lived in rental houses was almost 80 percent in 1918. It was higher than the number of households in owned accommodation, which was around 56 percent (the number of families in their own houses was 22 percent). The number of households in rental houses declined gradually to around 68 percent in 1939, and remained steadily to the next 14 years in 1953. The number of families who lived in rental houses decreased gradually more than 5 percent in every 10 years from 1961, dropped at 31 percent in 2001, before increased to 36 percent in 2011.

On the other hand, from 22 percent in 1918, the number of families who had their own houses rose to around 30 percent in 1939 and remained in the next 14 years. After 1953, there was a gradual increase more than 5 percent every 10 years stared from 1961 to almost 70 percent in 2001, before dropped down a little bit to 64 percent in 2011.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrate the percentage ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and and Wales between 1918 and 2011. Overall, we clearly see that the number ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore increased to 36 percent in 2011. On the other hand, from 22 percent in 19...
^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... percent in 2001, before dropped down a little bit to 64 percent in 2011.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57272727273 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33241619126 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440909090909 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.6050694808 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122851045023 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804295516963 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796242900624 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132653065386 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980321034747 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.