The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The bar chart represents the portion of owning and renting accommodation by the householders in England and Wales since 1918 to 2011. As is shown by the chart, the trend of couples who had their own property and the others who still rent it showed a significant alteration during this period.
Before 1971, most of marriage people tend to live in a rented space. Referring to this statement, I 1918, more than 75% of householders in England and Wales decided to rent accommodation. However, this percentage kept slightly declining until both owned and rented accommodation portion reached its balance in 1971.
On the other hand, after 1971, the desire of British couples has changed to be more prefer to purchased their own accommodation than rented it. The highest percentage of this group of people who picked to own their property was in 2001 at just under 70%. Even though the percentage fell for approximately 5% between 2001 and 2011, having own accommodation still became the preference for the householders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-03 | tes | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-10 | piendop | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | Mingchow28 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Shirley Liang | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | neocsc | 67 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 52
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04142011834 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88127404721 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5114951483 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43945319344 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187742759493 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14249436885 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297473695021 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890377380477 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.