How many percentages of households owned and rented the accommodation in England and Wales during 94 years since 1918 are depicted by the graph. The most significant facts to emerge from the graph are that the figure for couples who had their own property increased relatively during the period while the general trend was for households who rented their accommodation in England and Wales to decrease throughout the timescale. In addition, both of them met the same point in 1971.
Regarding households in owned accommodation, we can see that they experienced a significant growth. They started at nearly 20% in 1918, jumping relatively to around 70% -the greatest proportion- in 2001, and hitting off 60% in 2011.
On the other hand, the couple who rented property had a different pattern with owned accommodation. Not only did they decline from around 78% in 1918 to about 50%, which was a meeting point of the proportion both owned and rented, in 1971, they also continued to drop significantly to 30% -the smallest percentage of this section- in 2011, before tailing off roughly 35% at the end of the period.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 69
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 82
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 67
- Some people say that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places or crowded areas, while others disagree. Discuss and give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the greatest'.
Suggestion: -the the greatest
... 1918, jumping relatively to around 70% -the greatest proportion- in 2001, and hitting off 60...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the smallest'.
Suggestion: -the the smallest
... continued to drop significantly to 30% -the smallest percentage of this section- in 2011, be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while, as for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01069518717 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81655271587 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620320855615 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.2425659075 43.030603864 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287693634047 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128540675853 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114416187168 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17978638882 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795510925997 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.