The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
The bar chart illustrates how many men and women were working as teachers in six kinds of different British teaching places in 2010. Overall, it is clear that there was a gap in male and female teachers working in various schools except college, and the extremely obvious differences were in nursery or pre-school and primary school.
Starting with nursery/pre-school, primary school and secondary school, there were more female teachers than male ones. The largest gap could be seen in nursery/pre-school where 95% women but only 5% men taught. It was followed by that in primary school where there were 90% women but 10% men. The smallest gap was in secondary school, 55% versus 45%.
Turning now to private training institute and university, however, the percentage of male teachers exceeded that of female counterparts. Compared with 30% women, 70% men educated in university. 55% males instructed in private training institute while 45% females did so. It is worthwhile to notice that in college the number of men was equal to that of women(50%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | quynhthi2001 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | koinoyokan | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Nguyen My | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, and the government and big companies can make a difference. To what extent you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- In many countries, the elderly proportion of the population is increasing steadily. Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society? 73
- Which of the following courses do you recommend most for high school students to take: cooking, personal financial management, automobile repairing. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12790697674 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92593815993 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6936445996 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177336119546 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721885225053 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707509418996 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133755016452 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679570305191 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.