The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011.

The line graph reveals the proportion of four different age groups visiting the cinema monthly or more in one specific European country over the period of seven years between 2000 and 2011.

In general, as can be seen from the graph, there was an upward trend in the proportion of all age groups in the period shown. Furthermore, people between the age of 15 and 24 witnessed a dramatic rise.

In 2000, the proportion of people between 15 and 24 years old was 16%, followed by the 7-14 age group with 10%. The figure for the 15-24 age group continually rose until 2014, then fluctuated over the remaining period, and reached 52% in 2011. The percentage of people from the youngest group fluctuated over the period, and reached a peak at 37% in 2010, fell by approximately 10% in 2011.

The figure for both the 25-35 age group and the oldest age group was within 10% in 2010. Then the proportion for those 35 years old and over was increased by 10%, slightly increasing at 12% in 2011, while those between 25 and 35 went up in the first half of the period, and fluctuated in the remaining half. In 2011, the percentage for those aged 25 to 35 was 30%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-08 thaoliinhhhh 67 view
Essays by user hannahng :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., fell by approximately 10% in 2011. The figure for both the 25-35 age group and...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, then, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50710900474 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3867818055 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492890995261 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4707795036 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275691451716 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131867754255 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831909852649 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191964276267 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09434969811 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.