The chart below shows the percentage of people who are five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of eating habit between five species of fruit and vegetables, every day, in the United Kingdom livers over 8 years.
Overall, the types of investigators were divided into men, women and children. Likewise, women were the highest group to have a healthy eating habit, the second were men and children were not interested in it.
it can be clearly seen that women got a well starting at 22% and it rose consistently to the highest at 40% in 2006. Moreover, there were just 12% and 17% of children and men who were held a habit of eating healthy from 2001 to 2003, separately. Since 2003, the significant increases were observed in both the lowest species, the proportion of men and children raised to 27% and 22% individually in 2006.
After that, the trend of women dropped slightly to 35% and 30% after the two years. men also discovered a soft decrease in 2008, at 27% finally. However, while the data of children were declined to 25% eventually, it reached its highest at 26% in 2007.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-30 | cocococo123 | 11 | view |
2019-01-22 | Himanshi saini | 67 | view |
2018-12-20 | Har preet singh | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he United Kingdom livers over 8 years. Overall, the types of investigators were...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...hildren were not interested in it. it can be clearly seen that women got a we...
^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Men
...tly to 35% and 30% after the two years. men also discovered a soft decrease in 2008...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75138121547 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58388758987 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585635359116 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2608963313 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0729337733995 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316026459982 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049970236664 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531279634444 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533650081076 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.