The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
From the chart, we can see the percentage of people in the UK who consumed five portions of fruit and vegetables as a daily routine has increased from 2001 to 2008. The chart divides the British population into three categories, men, women and children.
More specifically, the year 2006 saw the highest percentage for women, more than 30% of whom ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day, but a decrease of about two per cents year on year can be seen thereafter.
Besides, no matter in which year, women were the group who ate most fruits and vegetables and children as the least. It is worthy to mention that the year 2004 saw a great rise of the figure after a three-year stability both for men and children. However, the percentage never reached 30% for men and children, which proves the differences between men and women in lifestyles.
Another point needed to notice is that the percentages of all the three groups dropped in the year 2008. However, overall, trend is going to be positive in terms of a healthy lifestyle.
- Long-Term International Migration, UK, 1999-2008 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
- Chart summarizing. 11
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cents'' or 'cent's'?
Suggestion: cents'; cent's
...er day, but a decrease of about two per cents year on year can be seen thereafter. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73224043716 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58903390074 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1305634308 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317542654759 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128117935125 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162522906139 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193823379857 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145740509314 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.