The chart below shows the percentage of people who use the internet for different purposes in 2007 and 2009.
The provider bar chart illustrate, information about the percentage of individuals who suffered the internet for seven different purposes from 2007 to 2009.
In 2007, the percentage of people who use internet for shopping was approximately 42 which was 7% more as compared to banking (35%). 36% individuals who used internet for book in 2007. The percent of internet user was 25 which was the 5% less as compared to learning (30%). in 2007 the portion of people who surfed the internet for video games and TV was almost 34 and 10 respectively.
In 2009, 55% of people used internet for shopping purpose and it was the highest as compared to other purposes. in banking purpose, 45% individuals use internet and 30% individual use internet for books. In 2009, the proportion of individual who used internet for chatting and learning was around 29 and 25 respectively, however, for video games and TV people use internet which was almost same.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of individuals who surfed internet for shopping was the highest whereas in case of TV the proportion of internet user was the lowest as compared to other purposes.
- many doctors say that people in today s world do not do enough physical exercise what do you think are the causes of this and what solution are there to this problem 56
- Some people think there should be free health care for all people but other disagree discuss both views 73
- Having more money and less free is better than earning less money and having more free time 73
- It is thought by some that it is better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside 56
- some people fail in school but end up being successful why do you think there is the case and what is the most important thing to succeed in life 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... was approximately 42 which was 7% more as compared to banking 35%. 36% individual...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ernet user was 25 which was the 5% less as compared to learning 30%. in 2007 the p...
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...he 5% less as compared to learning 30%. in 2007 the portion of people who surfed t...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the internet for video games and TV was almost 34 and 10 respectively. In 200...
^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... highest as compared to other purposes. in banking purpose, 45% individuals use in...
^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. In 2009, the proportion of individual who used internet for chatting and learn...
^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rning was around 29 and 25 respectively, however, for video games and TV people u...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7857342985 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430769230769 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1156015354 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448447098971 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.249377125051 0.103423049105 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104433631484 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315789910379 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100016105294 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.