The chart below shows the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison.
The pie chart compares the proportion of water consumed by various sectors in Sydney, Australia in the two years- 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the sector which used the highest percentage of water was the food industry sector in this period. Besides, after ten years, the proportion of water usage in the household use and service industry sector increased significantly while this figure for the remaining three sectors declined.
In 1997, the percentage of water used by the food sector was 48%, however, this figure for this sector decreased reasonably to 41% in 2007. Likewise, in the building industry and manufacturing sectors, the number of water consumptions down slightly. 5% of total water usage was in the building industry and 15% of total water usage was in the manufacturing sector. In the next ten years, the percentage of water used by two of these sectors both declined about 4%.
By contrast, there are an upward trend in the household and service industry sectors. Just increasing by 2% of the total water consumed by household use sector while this figure for service industry sector doubled, from 12% to 25% in 1997 and 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trends'?
Suggestion: trends
...t 4%. By contrast, there are an upward trend in the household and service industry s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60781206391 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45641025641 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0706985882 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255643321014 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131009163606 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793135174119 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190077859126 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052784742753 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.