The chart below shows the percentages of both males and females who ate 5 kinds of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK in 2006.
The column chart illustrates the differences and changes in the proportions of both genders who ate five different kinds of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK in 2006. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that percentages of females outnumbered that of males, except for over 75 year-old group with equal numbers. Noticeably, 56-65 year-old group dominated the market with the highest percentages,
In particular, in terms of women, the percentage of 56-65 year-old group was at 27%, which was the highest score, followed by 22% in 66-74 year-old group. The third largest proportion was 20%, which was represented by 26-55 years old. It was accompanied by over 75 years old at 19% and 15-25 year-old group constituted the smallest percentage.
Meanwhile, when it comes to males, the top three position were 56-65, 66-74, over 75 years old with 24%, 21%, 19% respectively, followed by 18% in 26-55 year-old group. The lowest proportion was 15%, which was represented by 15-25 years old. Noticeably, the gap was relatively closed over the research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-25 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | maiphuong0610 | 73 | view |
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods This is having a negative effect on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The table shows the number of international tourists arrivals in various countries in 2009 and 2010 89
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 61
- The table shows the change in the number of cinemas in different regions in a European country between 2004 and 2009 89
- The given scheme describes the production process of instant noodles 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79487668985 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9535104631 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103745571573 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638402611509 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141302162551 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100724064559 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134249424252 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.