The chart depicts a number of recreational accommodations and facilities that are prevalent among Canadian residents.
Overall, cinemas remained to be the most preferred place visited among expatriates and citizens. However, the ubiquity of theatres was the lowest for this matter.
As per the chart, Canadian citizens went to cinemas the most with the figure crossing 70% mark. In addition, regarding the figures indicating the prevalence of cinemas among expatriates from other countries and those from English-speaking countries, each accounted for 50% and 60%, respectively.
Additionally, migrants born in other countries went to libraries the most out of the three groups, but in terms of zoos, this group turned out to visit those places the least. On the contrary, migrants who originated from English-speaking countries preferred zoos the most with 50%, following by those who were born in Canada of which the figure reached merely 45%. The trend is similar for theatre, topped by English-speakers from other countries and bottomed out by the migrants from other countries.
- It is often argued that it is difficult to get children to read Why do you think this is What measures could be taken to encourage children to read more Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 67
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 90
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- The plans show Ashford in 2010 and Ashford now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the migrants from other countries.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5748502994 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10067489493 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0298815988 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0541471475409 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278002224007 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257148906319 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373683952526 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132694347619 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.