The chart below shows the proportions of graduates from Brighton University in 2019 entering different employment sectors Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The information about the proportion of graduate students from the Brighton University in 10 different working sectors is illustrated by the given pie chart. The year under consideration form 2019.
Thus, from an Overall, it is crystal clear that maximum graduates of Brighton University get employment in service industries, while minimum in sports as compare to other working sectors.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen from chart that in 2019, employment sectors of graduates from Brighton University were registered the highest percentage in service industries sector, that accounted about 33.0%. It was followed by Manufacturing industry, having proportion of 16.3%. Whereas, 14.7% were recorded in case of education sector.
Moving further, the students those take job in politics and government sectors were 2% less than education, while transportation and warehousing were the half of education sector employees. Surprisingly, employment in science & technology sectors were almost same by 7%. Civil service worker were 5.6% of graduates. However, other (2.8%), charity (0.3%), and sport (0.1%) were recorded the lowest.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...tered the highest percentage in service industries sector, that accounted about 33.0%. It ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g industry, having proportion of 16.3%. Whereas, 14.7% were recorded in case of educati...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, thus, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67647058824 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94267704234 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652941176471 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.4324078726 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254627886803 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094220820173 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988875332093 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176099959455 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917837094441 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.