The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrates consuming habits and purchasing as the relate to coffee and tea in 5 different cities in Australia namely : Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart over the last 4 weeks
Overall, Most of residents in cities in Australia went to a café for coffee and tea except Adelaide while purchasing fresh coffee was less common in last 4 weeks
Looking first of all at going to cafes, it was most characteristic of Melbourne and Hobart at the same percentage 64% .The figure for Sydney was slightly lower by 3% and followed by Brisbane at approximately 56% and finally Adelaide at under 50%. However the percentage of citizens who bought instant coffee in Brisbane and Hobart was higher and 50% which stood at 53% and 54% respectively, compared to Sydney (46%) ,Melbourne (47%) and lastly Adelaide at 50%
Stocking up on fresh coffee was below 45% for all cities. It was most common in Sydney (44%) and Melbourne (42%). Hobart was next at 39%, and Adelaide and Brisbane were much lower and nearly level at around 34

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ates consuming habits and purchasing as the relate to coffee and tea in 5 different cities...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the residents') or simply say ''Most residents''.
Suggestion: Most of the residents; Most residents
... Hobart over the last 4 weeks Overall, Most of residents in cities in Australia went to a café f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ne and Hobart at the same percentage 64% .The figure for Sydney was slightly lower...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... and Hobart at the same percentage 64% .The figure for Sydney was slightly lower by...
^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... 56% and finally Adelaide at under 50%. However the percentage of citizens who bought i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee in Brisbane and Hobart was higher and 50% which stood at 53% and 54% respectiv...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...54% respectively, compared to Sydney 46% ,Melbourne 47% and lastly Adelaide at 50%...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, lastly, look, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80898876404 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65171939359 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 221.097687686 43.030603864 514% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 214.0 112.824112599 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.5 22.9334400587 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5 5.23603664747 296% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0717576961754 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346966899031 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379869139487 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649694288974 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045688010794 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 13.2329268293 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.74 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.