The bar chart illustrates the outcome of the survey. Which conduct the observation of the people's routine purchasing and drinking coffee and tea in five cities of Australia Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart for four weeks. Overall, Sydney, Melbourne, and Hobart people have been visiting more in a cafe for drinking coffee or tea. The demand for fresh coffee is least in all cities. The usage of instant coffee is between 45% to 54% in all cities.
In Sydney, Melbourne, and Hobart more than 60% of inhabitants have been visited a cafe for drinking coffee or tea. Inhabitants of Sydney, Brisbin, and Adelaide purchased instant coffee more than 45%. However, inhabitants of Brisbane and Hobart consume instant coffee more than 50%. In Sydney and Melbourne consumption of fresh coffee is 44% and 42% respectively. In Brisbane and Adelaide consumption of fresh coffee is equal to 34%.In Hobart usage of fresh coffee is 37%.
In addition, in Sydney 43% of inhabitants purchased fresh coffee, 45% got instant coffee, and 61% went to cafes for coffee or tea during the last four weeks. Melbourne used 42% fresh coffee, 46% instant coffee, and 63% visit a cafe for drinking coffee or tea. Brisbane inhabitants purchased 34% fresh coffee, 52% instant coffee, and 55.5% visit a cafe for coffee or tea during the last four weeks.
on the other hand, Adelaide inhabitants purchased 34% fresh coffee, 50% instant coffee, and 49% went to cafes for coffee or tea in the last four weeks. Hobart inhabitants used 38% fresh coffee, 54% bought instant coffee, and 62% went to cafes for coffee or tea in the last four weeks.
- IELTS Writing Task 2 Education 56
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 61
- what is the causes and solutions of air pollution 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54850896784 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412087912088 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3390161822 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102785682055 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661293512052 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467629976442 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959171612511 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682777689921 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.