The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

The bars graph indicates the details of Australian people about their preferences of buying and consuming tea and coffee. This survey was conducted from five different places of Australia.

To begin with Sydney, Almost similar number of people (45%) prefered to by fresh and instant coffee cups in last 4 week. And about 60% people personally went to the cafe and enjoyed their of tea or coffee there. Moveing to another City Melbourne, fresh coffee consumers were in the same number as Sydney. Instant coffee e was bought and drunk by 47% of individuals. Melbourne and Hobart had almost same percentage in terms of of people who prefer to go and drink in cafe.

Furthermore, another two cities Brisbane and Adelaide had 34% customers of fresh coffee in last 28 days. 53% and 50% people chose there instant coffee respectively in Brisbane and Adelaide. Coffee and tea drinkers also went to cafe were little high in Brisbane and few less in in Adelaide then the half. Fresh coffee buyers were 37%, but this number went high when it comes to instant coffee buyers in Hobart.

Overall, australians generally prefer to go and drink their coffee or tea in coffee shop. There were few people in the group of instant coffee drinkers and lowest number of individuals were chose fresh coffee.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...art had almost same percentage in terms of of people who prefer to go and drink in ca...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...re little high in Brisbane and few less in in Adelaide then the half. Fresh coffee bu...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...s and lowest number of individuals were chose fresh coffee.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86818181818 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41148680176 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504545454545 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.7474653119 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.3846153846 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192133024614 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813163166873 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435784451591 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138104722895 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294041429519 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.