The below chart gives result from survey from residents in five cities of Australia which who many of them buying and drinking coffee based on their habits in last 4 weeks.
Overall, people who went to a cafe for coffee or tea in last 4 weeks achieved high percentage and in contrast, bought fresh coffee in all cites are in down side level. Meanwhile, individuals who had a habit for bought instant coffee smaller than bought fresh coffee in all cites expect Adelaide by tiny difference. Furthermore, Brisbane allocated lowest level in residents who bought fresh coffee.
Sydney’s residents who have habits in bought fresh and instant coffee roughly next together with nearly 45%, while 25% less than people who went for coffee or tea. By keeping same value in Melbourne, people for fresh coffee descending and instant coffee ascending.
In Brisbane, residents for coffee or tea and instant coffee almost around 55 % and 20% more than bought fresh coffee. In concurrent at Adelaide this resemble bolder than Brisbane and near 50% as 25% higher than fresh coffee, and, finally Hobart approximately allocated peak residents in cafe for coffee or tea also instant coffee habits.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: hesper105
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: DOWN_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'downside'?
Suggestion: downside
...bought fresh coffee in all cites are in down side level. Meanwhile, individuals who had a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'allocated the lowest'.
Suggestion: allocated the lowest
... tiny difference. Furthermore, Brisbane allocated lowest level in residents who bought fresh cof...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43486579272 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6233107765 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168304070925 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924553465715 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675392990327 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132390404863 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715355958312 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.