The given line chart illustrates the trend and the amount of three kinds of crimes between 1970 and 2005 in England and Wales.
Overall, it is evident that all the number of these three crimes increased, although, in some periods, they showed a downward trend, in the end, all of these were higher than their original number.
To specify, the amount of car theft gradually increased from 1970 to 1990, the rate of increase was 15%. In the next 5 years, it peaked at 1.6 million from 1 million, then dropped sharply back to 1 million in 2005 as same as in 1990. The trend of house burgling was opposite with car shift, in the first decade, it soared with a 35% rate, especially around 1980, it was a particular period that the number of house burgling was the highest than car theft and street robbery. After that, it declined with some fluctuations. In 2005, it decreased to 0.3 million. Moreover, the amount of street robbery was relatively stable, it grew slightly from 0.1 million to 0.4 million over the period.
Interestingly, street robbery which with the least number of three kinds of crimes had the highest rate of rise (30%), house burgling and car theft at the same rate (15%).
- The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005 67
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone-damaging gases from 1980 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65876777251 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35736140723 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530805687204 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6441400297 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173183603107 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817727796436 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085306838199 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131909389805 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099836303805 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.