The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002

The bar chart provides information about variant UK telephone calls in a period of time, from the years 1995 to 2002. As figure illustrates, local call has roughly a normal distribution, and two other types have an increasing trend during this period.

In the year 1995, the maximum call type was related to local call while national and international (fixed line) with mobile call had located in second and third places respectively. Furthermore, this pattern repeated during all period and they could not overtake local fixed line.

It seems that using portable lines had their minimum consumption in the year 1995, and their usage had reached to over 40 billion minute calls in the year 2002 by maximum amount of consumption. Also, national and international fixed line had the same pattern of calls that experienced their highest and lowest statistics in the years 2002 and 1995 respectively. However, local fixed line, reached its maximum usage in the year 1999 while it had approximately the lowest consumption in both 1995 and 2002.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n about variant UK telephone calls in a period of time, from the years 1995 to 2002. As figure...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, second, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24561403509 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.703057836 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7625115955 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18437674057 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999992335964 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850897572919 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133701666588 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049388077588 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.