The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into 3 categories, from 1995 to 2002.
Summarise the informations by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The chart shows key data on the amount of time UK people spent on 3 types of telephone calls over 8-year period.
Overall, the national and international fixed line phone calls gradually increased over years, and the mobile type illustrated the similar pattern. Whereas the local fixed line services fluctuated over the period.
At the beginning of the period, there was a mark contrast between 3 categories. People mostly called via local line with around 72 billions minutes. This call type continued to grow little by little and reaches a peak in 1999 with 90 billions, then saw a fall to about 72 billions in 2002.
On the contrary, the initial data of national and international type was about 37 billions-over half of the local one. There after, this kind of phone call rose slowly in the first 6 years and remained constant in the last 2 years within 60 billions minutes. Similarly, mobile calls seemed unpopular at first, but this category increased slightly over years and began to soar at the end of the period and may dominate in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e type illustrated the similar pattern. Whereas the local fixed line services fluctuate...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'half' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'halves'.
Suggestion: halves
...ational type was about 37 billions-over half of the local one. There after, this kin...
^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Thereafter
...37 billions-over half of the local one. There after, this kind of phone call rose slowly in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, similarly, so, then, whereas, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83516483516 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53579613645 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9134762697 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108369022508 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469639794566 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042275342413 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763939222935 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463017847751 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.