The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the minutes of phone call in three different services in the United Kingdom over a 7-year period
Overall, Britishers spent more time on calling by phones throughout the period. While local-fixed line was called by for the longest time in all examined years, mobiles were seen with the shortest number of minutes calling
In 1995, people preferred to make phone calls through local-fixed line the most with around 70 billion minutes, this number grew steadily to reach its peak at 90 and remained unchanged in one more year. Then this figure began to drop to the beginning data, which was about 70 billion minutes
As far as national and international-fixed line and mobiles are concerned, the gap between these categorises was really significant in the beginning year with almost 35%. Although there was steady growths was seen in the number of minutes called through these two methods, this trend was witnessed in the figure for national and international-fixed line for the whole period, while the figure for mobiles rose remarkably after 1999 and ended up at roughly 45 billion minutes which was just about 15% lower than that of the figure for national and international-fixed line
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | dkhnh_2603 | view | |
| 2022-06-22 | dkhnh_2603 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | chi150901 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 73 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 61
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 78
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, really, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.115 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8467130168 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 22.4926829268 222% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3478879865 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 255.75 112.824112599 227% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.0 22.9334400587 218% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115742478428 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773202297986 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035546607063 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893350629194 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284747309913 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.7 13.2329268293 209% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 20.73 61.2550243902 34% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.3012195122 221% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 10.9970731707 200% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 11.0658536585 253% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.