the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephones calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002

Essay topics:

the chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephones calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002

line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;">The chart presented data about whole minutes of telephone calls in billions from citizens in the UK. The statistics separated into three groups, from 1995-2002.

line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;">From 1995 to 1999, regional line increased gradually and was the most number of minutes at that time. The local fixed line peaked at 90 billions minutes in 1999, as know as almost double national line and mobiles. From 2000 to 2002, neighborhood line went down slightly, despites this line was still at the top of the call minutes.

line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;">Global group was the second place about number of minutes from 1995 to 2002. this group growth rised fast, from 38 billions minutes to 60 minutes. national and international fixed line reached the highest point of 60 billions minutes in 2001 and 2002.

line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;">Telephone calls from mobiles was the lowest of the call minutes, thought it was increased by the time. mobiles calls hit a low of billions minutes calls (3 billions minutes) in 1995. From 1996 to the end, this categories grew gradually and peaked at 45 billions minutes in 2002.

line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;">The chart had many disparities between three classes. The local line was the highest number of minutes, despite it declined minimally. Global line was the second place and mobiles was the last, both two groups grew steadily every years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-02 keisha2602 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Line-height
line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;&...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Line-height
... three groups, from 1995-2002. line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;&...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Line-height
...t the top of the call minutes. line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;&...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ut number of minutes from 1995 to 2002. this group growth rised fast, from 38 billio...
^^^^
Line 11, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: National
...from 38 billions minutes to 60 minutes. national and international fixed line reached th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Line-height
...ions minutes in 2001 and 2002. line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;&...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Mobiles
..., thought it was increased by the time. mobiles calls hit a low of billions minutes cal...
^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 264, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... minutes in 1995. From 1996 to the end, this categories grew gradually and peaked at...
^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Line-height
...t 45 billions minutes in 2002. line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;&...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.4511627907 4.92477711251 131% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 9.27986124735 2.65546596893 349% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502325581395 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5814520918 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0714285714 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3571428571 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262201016419 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129541228242 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844615025049 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19861825958 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103497977744 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.54 11.4140731707 171% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.