The bar chart compares the amount of time spent by people in the UK on three different types of phone call between 1995 and 2002.
It is clear that calls made via local, fixed lines were the most popular type, in terms of overall usage, throughout the period shown. The lowest figures on the chart are for mobile calls, but this category also saw the most dramatic increase in user minutes.
In 1995, people in the UK used fixed lines for a total of just over 70 billion minutes for local calls, and about half of that amount of time for national or international calls. By contrast, mobile phones were only used for around 4 billion minutes. Over the following four years, the figures for all three types of phone call increased steadily.
By 1999, the amount of time spent on local calls using landlines had reached a peak at 90 billion minutes. Subsequently, the figure for this category fell, but the rise in the other two types of phone call continued. In 2002, the number of minutes of national / international landline calls passed 60 billion, while the figure for mobiles rose to around 45 billion minutes.
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls In the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 46
- Climate change is a big environmental problem that has become critical in last couple of decades. Some people claim that humans should stop burning fossil fuels and use only alternative energy resources, such as wind and solar power. Others say that oil, 56
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259090909091 0.268076937826 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.104545454545 0.116061578633 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0863636363636 0.0759168565197 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0318181818182 0.0366838410393 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00454545454545 0.0131127313244 35% => OK
Prepositions: 0.195454545455 0.155750635184 125% => OK
Participles: 0.0409090909091 0.0379272487307 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.30593030245 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00454545454545 0.0210936926555 22% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.104545454545 0.0948980150116 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1120.0 1161.00487805 96% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.9 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65656565657 5.90752243213 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73763899035 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.30303030303 0.337110787985 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.186868686869 0.247514529752 75% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.121212121212 0.171178102325 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0555555555556 0.112407865282 49% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.30593030245 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.546246751206 103% => OK
Word variations: 50.9204560746 49.3433353143 103% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0094962315 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1629320381 42.9750493124 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 135.714022679 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.0094962315 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.689975730869 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 40.6868686869 47.7609492067 85% => OK
Elegance: 3.51612903226 2.94281807926 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498320157436 0.418131533498 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111311057316 0.181151798455 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.055800674657 0.0850326197045 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.6844672019 0.706616315825 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163225673546 0.157042692854 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.263535105155 0.228904883108 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109256427426 0.108899403657 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.370220033903 0.367819155151 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0895103510693 0.0812612215331 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380146231654 0.316326947829 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057878923392 0.0921553760075 63% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.08536585366 98% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.02926829268 132% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.