The bar chart depicts information about the total duration of telephone calls by three different categories in Britain between 1995 and 2005.
Firstly, the most widespread way of communication was fixed line. British phone calls in local areas were estimated to bedrock Smedley 72 billion minutes initially. By 1999, this number had rising to nearly 90, which was the highest point reached during a seven-year period. Starting from 2000, the quantity of time began falling and in 2002 it decreased to its initial number of 72 billions. Oncontract, national and international lines and mobiles were gaining popularity over this period.
Considering phone calls on long distances, its generation increased constantly from roughly 35 in 1995 to slightly more than 60 (billions). Likewise, the total number of minutes of mobile had soared gradually by 1998. After that, it started rising dramatically, and was accounted for almost 45 billions, though all calls lasted only 5 billion minutes in 1995
Overall, whereas local lines eventually remained on the same level, national and international lines together with mobiles increased in number of minutes during 1995 to 2002.
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows the world s ten most expensive countries for petrol along with other financial information Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990 Causes of land degradation by region 56
- The diagram shows the process by which milk and related products are produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features Write at least 150 words 61
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, likewise, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4043715847 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74482348406 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650273224044 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.270904363 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209836644537 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080054918284 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627955862127 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133944177758 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496342291035 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.