The bar graph illustrates the amount of time spent on three different types of phone call in the United Kingdom between 1995 and 2002.
At first glance, local phone calls took the highest number of billion minutes in the country, while mobile calls took the lowest amount of time. However, mobile lines were getting popular, especially in the early 00's.
People in the UK spent most of their time on domestic calls, which were spent for well above 70 billion minutes in 1995 and the number peaked at 90 billion minutes in 1999. Despite being the most consumed among all the other calls, callers started to spend lesser time on this kind of call as it can be seen that the number fell to more than 70 billion minutes in 2002.
On the other hand, mobile calls were the least used among callers in the UK, with less than five billion minutes being called in 1995. Yet, the total time of mobile lines increased over the years steadily. The highest amount of time calling through mobile line was around 45 billion minutes in 2002, showing the gaining popularity of mobile calling in the country.
- Although more and more people read the news on internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 67
- Some people argue that individual can do nothing to improve the environment. Therefore, only government and large companies can make a difference. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 78
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, well, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67010309278 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.97435465657 2.65546596893 74% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546391752577 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6773319683 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207772898819 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982506280169 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504499478294 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131296247421 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324689319316 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.