The chart below shows the total number of munites ( in billions) of telephone calls in the UK.divided into categories, from 1995 - 2002.
The multiple bar graph illustrates the information about the quantity of all telephone calls time in England and it was categorized into three partitions (local to fixed-line, national and international - fixed-line and mobiles) between 1995 and 2002. Units are measured in billion minutes.
Generally speaking, the number of mobile calls and national and international to landline calls were gradually increased while, local to landline calls have been wend up and went down in this time period.
Indeed, caller time off into the UK was approximately 75 billion minutes which was the majority in 1995 while, mobile caller time and other type were about 3 billion minutes and 38 billion munites respectively. The number of handphone usage had been steadily climbed so that, it was improved from 4 billion to an exact 50 billion when 2002. Furthermore, the least significant difference between every call types year was in 2002.
To sum up, communicating time through Britain using landline was exceeded that of the other two types of transition mode in a given time period.
- The table below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in European countries 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because of people able to buy the same product anywhere in the world. Do you think is a positive or negative development 73
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television however television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- The map below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...en 1995 and 2002. Units are measured in billion minutes. Generally speaking, the numb...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'wended', 'went'.
Suggestion: wended; went
...hile, local to landline calls have been wend up and went down in this time period. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22543352601 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82172202861 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8283875939 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225880683562 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995959301633 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524750823851 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118387405388 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826434362783 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.