the chart below shows the total of volume of telephone calls ( in million minutes) in Denmark, devided into three categories, from 1995 to 2004
The presented line chart provides the number of telephone calls which were calculated in million minutes in Denmark during nine years and it were also divided into 3 groups, namely national landline, international landline and mobile.
In general, there are different trends in 3 categories. While the total of telephone calls by international landline and mobile increased, one by national landline decreased comparing to the first year.
Firstly, in 1995, national landline’s telephone calls accounted for 12 million minutes, more than 11 million minutes mobile’s telephone calls. From 1995 to 2000, both of Denmark’s telephone calls by national landline and mobile experienced a moderate rise, at above 16 and 3 million minutes respectively. After that, there were a slight drop in the number of telephone calls by national landline, at 15 million minutes in 2002. By contrast, that of by mobile shooted tremendously up 6 million minutes. In the last three years, while the total of mobile’s telephone calls reached at peak 20 million minutes, the time which people use national landline to call decline huge to under 10 million minutes.
In term of the number of time people use international landline to communicate, it made up 6 million minutes in 1995. Then, having climbed slightly during 9 years and stood at 8 million mintutes in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-31 | tramhuynh123 | 86 | view |
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 84
- Task 2 As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 54
- The average temperatures 78
- sfasfas 11
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993and March 1999. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...elephone calls which were calculated in million minutes in Denmark during nine years an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31797235023 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00219008735 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52534562212 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8814439302 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321429405197 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135292433154 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602199411046 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180468026488 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599689710029 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.