The Chart below shows the value of one country s export in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015

The bar chart shows the total value of exported products from various categories of a specific nation in 2015 and 2016 while the table indicates growth rates of mentioned categories in 2015 compared with the figures in 2016. Overall, Petroleum products and Engineered goods are the major exported products while textiles showed the least value. In the table, Textiles had the highest growth rate and the gem and jewellery category experienced a downward trend.

Having looked at the bar chart for more details, it is clear that the value of petroleum products was the highest, accounted for approximately 60 billion dollar in 2015 and 2016. Engineered goods saw a similar pattern, when its total value in 2015 and 2016 were under and over 60 billion dollars respectively. Ranking third was gems and jewellery products, its figures were less than petroleum products’ value around 20 billion dollars, taking up roughly 40 billion dollars anually. The value of agricuture and textiles exports were the least. While agriculture products’ figures remained stable at 30 billion dollars in 2 years, the figures for textiles witnessed a dramatic rise from arounf 25 billion dollars to over 30 billion dollars.

Focusing on the rest data given, it is apparent that textiles’ category had the highest development potential, rising approximately 15.24 percent compared with the 2015’s data. The growth rates of petroleum and engineered exports were 8.5 percent and 3 percent respectively. Notably, agricultural products’ growth rate was trivial, remaning under 1 percent. In contrast, there was a slight decrease of 5 percent in the sum value of gem and jewellery category in 2016.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, third, well, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31835205993 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76060705985 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505617977528 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3071049525 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275704478723 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116479127615 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133919408931 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218633910476 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126903063854 0.0819641961636 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.