The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the

The given bar chart unfolds a statistical comparison in a particular country’s export earnings from five different types of goods between 2015 and 2016 with its unit being measured in billion dollars. The table illustrates the percentage difference in values of each category of exports from 2015 to 2016. Overall, this country experienced a growing tendency in the money earned from exports except the category of gems and jewellery.
As is illustrated in the bar chart, there was a small reduction in the profit generated from gems and jewellery with its amount dropping by 2 billion dollars in 2016. In contrast, a steady increase occurred in the export earnings of the other four categories. In 2015, for instance, the money accruing from petroleum products and agricultural products were 61 and 31 billion dollars, and both categories had a growth of 1 billion dollars in 2016. Likewise, 57 and 27 billion dollars were gained from engineered goods and textiles respectively in 2015, and both of them had an increase of around 4 billion dollars in 2016.
According to the table, textiles had the largest percentage change in 2016 as opposed to 2015, escalating to 15.24%, whereas only a slight rise of 0.81% occurred in agricultural products. Moreover, there was an upward trend in the percentages of petroleum products, engineered goods with their figures rising by 3% and 8.5% respectively. However, gems and jewellery had a drop of 5.18% from 2015 to 2016.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...nd 2016 with its unit being measured in billion dollars. The table illustrates the perc...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, whereas, for instance, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10373443983 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88447707313 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53112033195 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9978408561 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281801725956 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133441845875 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105552991107 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206099543864 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877925585109 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.