In recent years, there has been considerable debate about what is the best way to expand people’s social circle. Some claim that the majority prefer to socialize online rather than meet with others in real life. In my opinion, this is a negative development which can lead to some dangerous situations, mental health issues, and also embarrassing problems later in life.
One serious problem arising from people socializing online is that it can contribute to internet fraud. In the pre-Internet era, people who wanted to make more new friends had no choice but to meet others face to face. Owing to the real interaction, people were more likely to detect others’ deception or tricks. Nevertheless, with the prevalence of the internet nowadays, people can conceal their genuine identities with ease and try to engage in something illegal online. For instance, some online fraudsters may assume a fake identity and use their “sweet” words to establish a relationship with people that do not stay alert. Then, they will ask those people for money, promising that they will pay it back soon; however, when they receive the money, they will immediately delete and block those gullible people from their friend’s list and continue looking for the next victim. Therefore, online socialization will not only increase the risk of suffering emotional betrayal but also incur a financial loss.
Another repercussion is the risks associated with social awkwardness. For example, young children are addicted to smartphones nowadays, so they spend a great deal of time chatting with their friends online using pictures and icons. It seems convenient to do so on the internet, but gradually, they will feel uncomfortable when they talk with others in real life. These uneasy feelings are due to the fact that they have been losing their communicative skills. As a result, they become shy and prone to stammer in the presence of other people, especially the opposite sex. Thus, online interaction will also produce more socially awkward introverts.
Last but not least, socializing online can give rise to embarrassment in the future. For instance, people like to send their private photos to others in their online conversation; nonetheless, it will become a thing that they can use to take revenge on others if they end the relationship. They might use these embarrassing pictures to threaten others and appease their anger. This will make the victims awkward after the photos are publicized. Hence, online interaction will result in future embarrassment.
In conclusion, the negative impacts of socializing online far outweigh the benefits it can bring to people. Although it has brought much convenience to people’s daily life, it still has lots of problems that people need to deal with. Therefore, people should strike their balance between online interaction and face-to-face meeting.
- now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development 81
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development 84
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- Zoos are inhumane and should be abolished To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...e new friends had no choice but to meet others face to face. Owing to the real interac...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 461.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27548806941 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79225843162 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 176.041082164 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55748373102 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4400149702 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2083333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 3.9879759519 476% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230159761777 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736186190377 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657048305199 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148507884591 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748943453168 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.