The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The bar chart compares four different wastes, namely paper, glass, tins and garden, which was collected by a recycling area between 2011 and 2015.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the total amount of waste fluctuated slightly. Additionally, while paper waster was the most gathered type of reclaimed garbage, the opposite was true for garden trash during the period.
In 2011, paper was the most converted kind of rubbish, at just under 60 tons, followed by glass accounted for nearly 50 tons. Meanwhile, 35 tons of tins were recovered and this number was 3% higher than garden waste.
Over four years ensuing, all four types of waste witnessed an oscillation throughout the period. Details, the quantity of collected waste paper reached the highest point of 70 tons in 2015 after hitting the lowest point of 40 tons in 2013. In contrast, the figures for other kinds of waste only insignificantly increased in the final year of the period compared to the first year, with 52 tons of glass, 39 tons of tins and 35 tons of garden being put in one place in the last year.
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 89
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009 84
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 78
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012. 73
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81481481481 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46597176968 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5204281065 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137794268795 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624416265835 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708077483796 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927786471115 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809049293113 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.