The chart belows shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in uk,divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar chart illustrates the total billions minutes call done by u.k people with diverse call category from 1995-2002.
Most noticeably of all, it can be seen that in 1995 u.k people used local line for maximum call; 72 billions minutes while 35 billions minutes time was spent through National and International line whilst least people spent time through mobile;2 billions minutes. Surprisingly time spent through local line gradually hiked until 1997 reaching 89 billions minutes. Similarly, until 1998 time spent through National and International calls and mobiles also followed upward trend and reached about ( 48 billions minutes and 8 billions minutes respectively).
In contrast, after 1998 time spent through mobiles call experienced drastic increased with 45 billions minutes record in 2002. Likewise, calls through National and International Lines went up until 2001 than remained relatively constant in 2002 with 61 billions minutes. But calls done through local lines drastically slumped down to 72 billions minutes time spent in 2002, though it was the only call type which was given more priority by UK people.
To sum up, Local lines was used maximum at all and National and International calls rose and remained constant while mobiles calls hiked in all years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-05 | Jasish bhattarai | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in USA since 1980 with projections unitl 2030. 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 11
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 67
- The chart belows shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in uk,divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in USA since 1980 with projections unitl 2030. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... followed upward trend and reached about 48 billions minutes and 8 billions minut...
^^
Line 13, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le. To sum up, Local lines was used maximum at all and National and Internat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, similarly, so, while, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42786069652 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5732986215 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3011387029 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.375 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233338970301 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136938990318 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922812374184 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1835319507 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110437175074 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.