The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015.
The given line graph represents the number of hamburgers, Pizza and Fried Chicken that teenagers in Mauritius consumed between 1985 and 2015.
What stands out from the graph is that while the consumption of hamburgers and fried chicken witnessed an upward trend, the opposite trend was for Pizza. Obviously, Mauritian teenagers' favorite fast-food changed significantly.
In 1985, Pizza was most eaten by teenagers in Mauritius with 60 times, followed by hamburgers (10 times) and fried chicken (5 times) which was below one tenth comparing with pizza. The period surveyed experienced a dramatic drop and became the least popular of the three in 2015.
With reference to Fried chicken and Hamburgers, after climbing up significantly in the first 20 years, fried chicken experienced a stability and then surged slightly to about 63 time in 2015. Over the past 30 years hamburgers saw a high jump and gained its popularity to be the most favorite kind of fast food among Mauritian teenagers with over 70 times which was 7 times higher than that of the first year in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-29 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 78
- Task 1 The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 11
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, as for, kind of, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02793296089 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67300776403 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8443001441 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221594336836 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106099979163 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520845737654 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139877327087 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314761473286 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.