The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. Summarise the information and Write at least 150 words.
The chart gives information about the daily minimum and maximum levels of SO2 and NO2, which causes air pollution in 4 different metropolises (Los Angeles, Calcutta, Beijing, and Mexico) in the year 2000. It is clear that Mexico was the highest and while the opposite was true for Calcutta.
As can be seen in the bar chart, In Los Angeles, the quantity of SO2 discharged into the atmosphere was the lowest of all cities, with the daily minimum at 2 micrograms per m3 and a maximum average of fives times as much, an average 10 microgram per m3 The levels of NO2 emissions were much higher with the levels of daily maximum reaching up to more than 104 micrograms per m3. Meanwhile, In Mexico, the levels of NO2 and SO2 average maximum and minimum were the highest in 4 cities, at 207 and 200 respectively.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in contrast with Los Angeles and Mexico City, the amount of NO2 average minimum in Calcutta and Beijing reached the lowest point at 30 and 14 micrograms per m3, respectively. The levels of SO2 average maximum in Mexico City was 2 times higher than that of Calcutta.
- The graph below shows the number of passengers using three railway networks from 1950 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Education is more effective than punishment in reducing crime Do you agree or disagree 89
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give you 89
- Food products labels should contain detailed information about that food To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What might be the most important information for food labels 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
...e of fives times as much, an average 10 microgram per m3 The levels of NO2 emissions were...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61809045226 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53526427823 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48743718593 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.852669246 43.030603864 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 153.166666667 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281415227249 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155592148428 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852027129772 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203828692028 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0098532094053 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.