The chart shows the changes in three different areas of Manchester City Centre from 2003-2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevent.

Essay topics:

The chart shows the changes in three different areas of Manchester City Centre from 2003-2012.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevent.

The line chart elucidates three different aspects of criminal activities, namely burglary, car theft, and robbery, at the Manchester City Centre over a decade, from 2003-2012.

Overall, it can be construed that there has been a significant decline in the number of burglaries, whereas, when we talk about the car theft, we can see a steady increase while robbery remained the same over the period at the City Centre.

As can be seen, the number of burglaries reached its peak in the year 2004 (approximately 3750) after which it experienced a telling decline over the next 4 years. The number of Car thefts remained steady until the year 2008 after which there was a continuous increase and amount reached almost 2800 at the end of the period.
While the measure of robbery remained the same throughout the decade, It did experience a little growth in the year 2005 when it reached almost 900. But, at the end of the period, it again came down to the same point from where it started, i.e. 600.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-10-29 kanishks95 78 view
Essays by user kanishks95 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75862068966 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51802853383 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.0609303353 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100044509221 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570180232348 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933288492186 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795105626647 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104871409936 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.